This guide is designed to help U of T students, faculty and researchers navigate the use of GenAI tools such as ChatGPT, MS CoPilot, and others in applied research contexts. Jump to a section or for more information, please refer to the recommended resources below.
As an overall guiding principle, if you have any questions or doubts about whether you should use AI in your assignments or other academic work we recommend that you always contact your course instructor or graduate supervisor for clarification.
GenAI as a research tool
Best practices
U of T MS CoPilot enterprise edition
Prompt engineering basics
Evaluating AI tools
Market research applications
Citing AI Generative Tools and AI Generated Content
Large Language Models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT are machine learning models designed for natural language processing. They anticipate and mimic human language.
They are not appropriate tools for all steps of research activity.
Concerns around hallucinations, quality of outputs, academic integrity (citations, plagiarism), copyright infractions, and lack of nuance in scholarly conversations may override the convenience of using such tools in your research.
Outsourcing your market analysis and critical thought to a machine requires understanding of:
If you opt to use an LLM for your research or assignment, University of Toronto recommends the U of T Microsoft CoPilot protected enterprise edition.
Prompt engineering: Designing and refining questions or instructions to provide context and elicit a specific response from an AI tool
There are many different types of prompts.
The ROBOT test developed by the LibrAIry, can be used to critically evaluate an AI application before or while using it. The following is reproduced with permission under Creative Commons Licence 4.0.
Being AI Literate does not mean you need to understand the advanced mechanics of AI. It means that you are actively learning about the technologies involved and that you critically approach any texts you read that concern AI, especially news articles.
We have created a tool you can use when reading about AI applications to help consider the legitimacy of the technology.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
To cite in APA: Hervieux, S. & Wheatley, A. (2020). The ROBOT test [Evaluation tool]. The LibrAIry. https://thelibrairy.wordpress.com/2020/03/11/the-robot-test
Useful research applications of generative AI tools can include:

Step 1: Identify the key concept you want to focus on. Here it is "cardiac rhythm management"
Step 2: Phrase the prompt to ask for "synonyms and related terms." Include an appropriate role and task, and any other necessary parameters, such as e.g. language.
Step 3: Review the resulting list yourself or with a subject expert for accuracy and relevancy, and make adjustments as required.
Step 4. Use the generated content to supplement, not replace your existing search strategy.
If permitted to use AI for an assignment, it is crucial that you cite any content produced by generative AI, or any functional use of the tool (such as editing, translating, etc.).
Style rules on how to cite AI generated content are new and evolving. There may not be official guidelines available yet for the citation style that you are using. In these instances, a starting point (as proposed by the style guidelines below) may be to approach citing AI in the same way you would cite software outputs, or personal communications.
If required to use AI tools for a course assignment, confirm with your professors to ensure the citing rules provided below are appropriate for their classes.
Citing in MLA
Citing in APA 7
Citing in Chicago Style
Gerstein Science Information Centre
9 King's College Circle
Toronto, ON, M5S 1A5
ask.gerstein@utoronto.ca
416-978-2280
Map![]()
About web accessibility. Tell us about a web accessibility problem.
About online privacy and data collection.
© University of Toronto. All rights reserved.