Harden, A. (2010). Mixed-methods systematic reviews: Integrating quantitative and qualitative findings. The National Center for the Dissemination of Disability Research (NCDDR). 25(8). https://ktdrr.org/ktlibrary/articles_pubs/ncddrwork/focus/focus25/Focus25.pdf

Heyvaert, M., Maes, B., & Onghena, P. (2013). Mixed methods research synthesis: Definition, framework, and potential. Quality and Quantity, 47, 659–676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9538-6

Kavanagh, J., Campbell, F., Harden, A., & Thomas, J. (2012). Mixed methods synthesis: A worked example. In Synthesizing Qualitative Research, 113–136. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119959847.ch6

Pluye, P., Hong, Q.N., & Vedel, I. (2016). Toolkit for mixed studies reviews (V3). Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, and Quebec-SPOR SUPPORT Unit. http://toolkit4mixedstudiesreviews.pbworks.com.

Sandelowski, M., Voils, C. I., Leeman, J., & Crandell, J. L. (2012). Mapping the mixed methods–Mixed research synthesis terrain. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(4), 317–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689811427913

Sandelowskil, M., Leeman, J., Knafl, K., & Crandell, J.L. (2012). Text-in-context: a method for extracting findings in mixed-methods mixed research synthesis studies. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 69(6), 1428– 1437. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12000