Project Information Literacy. (2015). Information Literacy Infographic. Retrieved from http://projectinfolit.org/images/img/pilresearchiglarge.png
Information literacy, the set of skills needed to find, retrieve, analyze, and use information (Association of College and Research Libraries, 2015), is often the starting point for building an effective faculty-librarian collaboration (Johnson & Magusin, 2005).
Information literacy as a phrase was coined by Paul Zurkowski in 1974 (Johnson & Magusin, 2005) but did not get significant exposure in the literature until 1989 with Breivik and Gee's landmark work Information literacy: Revolution in the library.
Starting Points for Background on Information Literacy
Association of College and Research Libraries. (2015). Introduction to information literacy. Retrieved from
http://www.ala.org/acrl/issues/infolit/overview/intro
Association of College and Research Libraries. (2015). Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education. Retrieved from
http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework
Breivik, P. Senn, & Gee, E. G. (1989). Information literacy: Revolution in the library. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Macmillan.
Curzon, S. C. (2004). Developing faculty-librarian partnerships in information literacy. In I. F. Rockman (Ed.), Integrating information
literacy into the higher education curriculum: Practical models for transformation (pp. 29-45). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Eisenberg, M. B. Lowe, C. A., & Spitzer, K. L. (2004). Information literacy: Essential skills for the information age (2nd ed.). Westport,
CT: Libraries Unlimited.
Johnson, K., & Magusin, E. (2005). Beyond the mechanics of online retrieval: Information literacy. In Exploring the digital library: A
guide for online teaching and learning. pp. 89-100. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Use the new ACRL information literacy Frames to explore threshold concepts. Threshold concepts originated as faculty pedagogical research within disciplines, but they are great starting points for collaboration among disciplinary faculty, librarians, teaching and learning center staff, and others.
Association of College and Research Libraries. (2015). Framewrok for Information Literacy for Higher Education. http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework
Project Information Literacy (PIL) is a non-profit, large-scale national study involving over 200 institutions in the U.S. conducted in partnership with the University of Washington's iSchool and led by Dr. Alison J. Head. Its aim is to investigate the research habits and modalities of young adults and adults. The PIL team states:
"Our goal is to understand how early adults conceptualize and operationalize research activities for course work and "everyday life" use and especially how they resolve issues of credibility, authority, relevance, and currency in the digital age. We have collected data from over 13,000 "early adults" enrolled in more than 60 community colleges and public and private colleges and universities in the U.S."
Project Information Literacy (May 5, 2015). About: What is PIL? Retrieved from http://projectinfolit.org/about on May 22, 2015.
Starting points in literature:
Brasley, S. S. (2008). Effective librarian and discipline faculty collaboration models for integrating information literacy into the fabric of an
academic institution. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 114, 71-88. doi:10.1002/tl.318
Cha, T.-Y., & Hsieh, P.-N. (2009). A Case Study of Faculty Attitudes toward Collaboration with Librarians to Integrate Information Literacy
into the Curriculum. Journal of Educational Media & Library Sciences, 46(4), 441-467.
Hayes-Bohanan, P.; Spievak, E. (2008): You can lead students to sources, but can you make them think? College & Undergraduate
Libraries, 15(1-2), 173-210.
Ivey, R. (2003). Information literacy: how do librarians and academics work in partnership to deliver effective learning programs?
Australian Academic and Research Libraries, 34(2), 100-113.
Johnston, B., & Webber, S. (2003). Information literacy in higher education: A review and case study. Studies in Higher Education, 28(3),
335-352.
Leckie, G. J., & Fullerton, A. (1999). Information literacy in science and engineering undergraduate education: Faculty attitudes and
pedagogical practices. College & Research Libraries, 60(1), 9-29.
Lindstrom, J., & Shonrock, D. D. (2006). Faculty-librarian collaboration to achieve integration of information literacy. Reference & User
Services Quarterly, 46(1), 18-23.
Reece, G. J. (2005). Critical thinking and cognitive transfer: Implications for the development of online information literacy tutorials.
Research Strategies, 20(4), 482-493.
Using the format of the online learning object / resource guide (often called a LibGuide) can pose some problems for students, especially if we want them to think critically about sources.
Alison Hicks, in her exploration of information literacy implications of using LibGuides, suggests new ways of conceptualizing sources and information.
Hicks, A. (2015, April 14). LibGuides: Pedagogy to oppress? Hybrid Pedagogy. Retrieved from
http://www.hybridpedagogy.com/journal/libguides-pedagogy-to-oppress/